Publications

All research has been conducted under the name SWoRD at the University of Pittsburgh’s Learning Research and Development Center.

Godley, A. J., DiMartino, S., & Loretto, A. (2016). Secondary Students’ Perceptions of Peer Review in Writing. Research in the Teaching of English, Volume 51, Number 2. View

Schunn, C. D., Godley, A. J., & DiMartino, S. (2016). The reliability and validity of peer review of writing in high school AP English classes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. View

Patchan, M. M. (2011). Peer review of writing: Learning from revision using peer feedback and reviewing peers’ texts. Doctoral dissertation, Cognitive Psychology, University of Pittsburgh.  View Download

Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C.D., & Russell, R. (2011). Writing in natural sciences: Understanding the effects of different types of reviewers on the writing process. Journal of Writing Research, 2(3), 365-393.  View Download

Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 27(4), 375-401.  View Download

Patchan, M. M., Charney, D., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). A validation study of students’ end comments: Comparing comments by students, a writing instructor, and a content instructor. Journal of Writing Research, 1(2), 124-152.   View Download

Wooley, R., Was, C., Schunn, C.D., & Dalton, D.W. (2008). The Effects of Feedback Elaboration on the Giver of Feedback, from the proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science society. Download: View

Cho, K., Chung, T. R., King, W. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Peer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement: An empirical investigation. Communications of the ACM, 51(3), 83-88.   View Download

Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers and Education, 48(3), 409-426.   View Download

Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication, 23(3), 260-294.  View Download

Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 891-901.  View

Leave Yours +

No Comments

Comments are closed.

  • Comments are Closed